Full Implementation
Full
Partial Implementation
Partial
Future Implementation
Future
Principle Not Adopted
Not
Filter the map by principle
Filter the states by principle
Supports For Teachers & Policy
Science of Reading (SOR) Training
Literacy/Reading Coaches
Educator Preparation Program (EPP) Alignment
Educator Preparation Program (EPP) Assessment
Funding for Literacy Efforts
Assessment & Parent Notification
Universal Reading Screener
Screener for Characteristics of Dyslexia
Parental Notification
Instruction & Intervention
District Adoption of High-Quality Instructional Materials
Eliminating Three-Cueing Instructional Materials
Individual Reading Plans
Regularly Monitor Student Progress
Evidence-Based Interventions
Summer Reading Camps
Parent Read-At-Home Plan
Retention & Intervention
Initial Determinant Retention at 3rd Grade Based on State Assessment
Multiple Options for Promotion
Good Cause Exemptions for Some Students
Supports For Teachers & Policy
Science of Reading (SOR) Training
Implemented in 44 states
States, schools and districts should establish the science of reading as the common language for literacy instruction and then provide training to teachers to build capacity to teach these foundational skills that all students need to become skilled readers.
ExcelinEd’s Science of Reading Professional Learning Rubric is designed to assist state educational agencies (SEAs) in their evaluation and selection of professional learning grounded in the science of reading. This rubric is intended for use by evaluators who have completed in-depth professional learning in the science of reading and have experience applying this knowledge in the classroom. As a result, SEAs can make an informed decision about the best professional learning provider for educators in their state.
ExcelinEd’s Science of Reading Professional Learning Rubric is designed to assist state educational agencies (SEAs) in their evaluation and selection of professional learning grounded in the science of reading. This rubric is intended for use by evaluators who have completed in-depth professional learning in the science of reading and have experience applying this knowledge in the classroom. As a result, SEAs can make an informed decision about the best professional learning provider for educators in their state.
Literacy/Reading Coaches
Implemented in 29 states
Literacy coaches are an important support mechanism for teachers in the classroom by working directly with teachers to improve classroom practice and, ultimately, student reading achievement school-wide.
Educator Preparation Program (EPP) Alignment
Implemented in 45 states
Aligning teacher preparation programs to the science of reading ensures that elementary school, early childhood and special education educators licensed in a state have been provided with a strong foundation in evidence-based literacy instruction.
Educator Preparation Program (EPP) Assessment
Implemented in 33 states
Aligning initial candidate licensure tests to the science of reading and evidence-based instructional practices are an efficient and comprehensive way for teachers to demonstrate they possess the knowledge and skills needed to teach students to read.
Funding for Literacy Efforts
Implemented in 45 states
The primary grades are the least expensive and most timely opportunity to ensure every student is a successful reader. States should look for ways to reprioritize existing local, state and federal fund to support reading instruction and intervention statewide.
Assessment & Parent Notification
Universal Reading Screener
Implemented in 43 states
An approved universal screener administered three times per year is a key step to identifying students at-risk for reading difficulties, including dyslexia.
Screener for Characteristics of Dyslexia
Implemented in 38 states
For early interventions to target areas of need, a student must be identified as at-risk for a reading difficulty, including students who may have characteristics consistent with dyslexia.
Parental Notification
Implemented in 42 states
Parents should be notified immediately if their child has been identified with a reading deficiency. As a trusted partner, parents need to be part of instructional decisions for their child and be provided with support on how to help their child with literacy at home.
Instruction & Intervention
District Adoption of High-Quality Instructional Materials
Implemented in 42 states
The materials that districts choose for reading instruction impact student learning and teacher practice. High-quality instructional materials aligned to the science of reading and the respective state standards give teachers access to quality content and assignments.
Eliminating Three-Cueing Instructional Materials
Implemented in 20 states
Three-cueing is a flawed literacy instructional practice that teaches students to read based on meaning, structure and syntax, and visual cues, which may also be known as “MSV." This instructional model should be eliminated from curricula because it encourages students to guess, not sound out, words they do not know based on pictures or what they think might make sense given the context of the sentence.
Individual Reading Plans
Implemented in 32 states
Students who have a reading deficiency should have an individual reading plan created. The plan should include intervention services the student will receive and strategies for parents to use at home with their child.
Regularly Monitor Student Progress
Implemented in 47 states
Progress monitoring helps teachers track a student's progress in reading and adjust instruction to meet the student's needs in a timely manner. Monitoring can take many forms and can be embedded in classroom instruction.
Evidence-Based Interventions
Implemented in 40 states
Interventions grounded in the science of reading should target students' individual needs beginning with the lowest deficit skill that has been identified by data.
Summer Reading Camps
Implemented in 20 states
Reading skills that are lost during the summer slows progress toward reading proficiency by the end of the third grade. Children in low-income families lose one to three months of reading skills each summer. Reading camps can both remediate learning loss and build skills at the same time.
Parent Read-At-Home Plan
Implemented in 35 states
Read-at-home plans help families support their child's literacy skills at home and are often included in an Individual Reading Plan (IRP). They should be provided to parents as soon as a student is identified with a reading deficiency or those students who may face retention in third grade.
Retention & Intervention
Initial Determinant Retention at 3rd Grade Based on State Assessment
Implemented in 18 states
A student who is unable to demonstrate sufficient reading skills on the state test-based options provided – and does not meet a good cause exemption – be retained.
Multiple Options for Promotion
Implemented in 20 states
The state offers at least three pathways for promotion to fourth grade including achieving a predetermined level on the state reading assessment, passing an alternative assessment or retest, or successfully demonstrating sufficient 3rd grade reading skills through a portfolio of student work.
Good Cause Exemptions for Some Students
Implemented in 18 states
Most students with disabilities and English Language Learners should be able to read on grade-level if provided with effective instruction and specialized support. However, there should be good cause exemptions that recognize the special needs of some students with disabilities, English language learners and students who were previously retained.
Reset Filter
Science of Reading (SOR) Training
Implemented in 44 states
States, schools and districts should establish the science of reading as the common language for literacy instruction and then provide training to teachers to build capacity to teach these foundational skills that all students need to become skilled readers.
ExcelinEd’s Science of Reading Professional Learning Rubric is designed to assist state educational agencies (SEAs) in their evaluation and selection of professional learning grounded in the science of reading. This rubric is intended for use by evaluators who have completed in-depth professional learning in the science of reading and have experience applying this knowledge in the classroom. As a result, SEAs can make an informed decision about the best professional learning provider for educators in their state.
ExcelinEd’s Science of Reading Professional Learning Rubric is designed to assist state educational agencies (SEAs) in their evaluation and selection of professional learning grounded in the science of reading. This rubric is intended for use by evaluators who have completed in-depth professional learning in the science of reading and have experience applying this knowledge in the classroom. As a result, SEAs can make an informed decision about the best professional learning provider for educators in their state.
Literacy/Reading Coaches
Implemented in 29 states
Literacy coaches are an important support mechanism for teachers in the classroom by working directly with teachers to improve classroom practice and, ultimately, student reading achievement school-wide.
Educator Preparation Program (EPP) Alignment
Implemented in 45 states
Aligning teacher preparation programs to the science of reading ensures that elementary school, early childhood and special education educators licensed in a state have been provided with a strong foundation in evidence-based literacy instruction.
Educator Preparation Program (EPP) Assessment
Implemented in 33 states
Aligning initial candidate licensure tests to the science of reading and evidence-based instructional practices are an efficient and comprehensive way for teachers to demonstrate they possess the knowledge and skills needed to teach students to read.
Funding for Literacy Efforts
Implemented in 45 states
The primary grades are the least expensive and most timely opportunity to ensure every student is a successful reader. States should look for ways to reprioritize existing local, state and federal fund to support reading instruction and intervention statewide.
Universal Reading Screener
Implemented in 43 states
An approved universal screener administered three times per year is a key step to identifying students at-risk for reading difficulties, including dyslexia.
Screener for Characteristics of Dyslexia
Implemented in 38 states
For early interventions to target areas of need, a student must be identified as at-risk for a reading difficulty, including students who may have characteristics consistent with dyslexia.
Parental Notification
Implemented in 42 states
Parents should be notified immediately if their child has been identified with a reading deficiency. As a trusted partner, parents need to be part of instructional decisions for their child and be provided with support on how to help their child with literacy at home.
District Adoption of High-Quality Instructional Materials
Implemented in 42 states
The materials that districts choose for reading instruction impact student learning and teacher practice. High-quality instructional materials aligned to the science of reading and the respective state standards give teachers access to quality content and assignments.
Eliminating Three-Cueing Instructional Materials
Implemented in 20 states
Three-cueing is a flawed literacy instructional practice that teaches students to read based on meaning, structure and syntax, and visual cues, which may also be known as “MSV." This instructional model should be eliminated from curricula because it encourages students to guess, not sound out, words they do not know based on pictures or what they think might make sense given the context of the sentence.
Individual Reading Plans
Implemented in 32 states
Students who have a reading deficiency should have an individual reading plan created. The plan should include intervention services the student will receive and strategies for parents to use at home with their child.
Regularly Monitor Student Progress
Implemented in 47 states
Progress monitoring helps teachers track a student's progress in reading and adjust instruction to meet the student's needs in a timely manner. Monitoring can take many forms and can be embedded in classroom instruction.
Evidence-Based Interventions
Implemented in 40 states
Interventions grounded in the science of reading should target students' individual needs beginning with the lowest deficit skill that has been identified by data.
Summer Reading Camps
Implemented in 20 states
Reading skills that are lost during the summer slows progress toward reading proficiency by the end of the third grade. Children in low-income families lose one to three months of reading skills each summer. Reading camps can both remediate learning loss and build skills at the same time.
Parent Read-At-Home Plan
Implemented in 35 states
Read-at-home plans help families support their child's literacy skills at home and are often included in an Individual Reading Plan (IRP). They should be provided to parents as soon as a student is identified with a reading deficiency or those students who may face retention in third grade.
Initial Determinant Retention at 3rd Grade Based on State Assessment
Implemented in 18 states
A student who is unable to demonstrate sufficient reading skills on the state test-based options provided – and does not meet a good cause exemption – be retained.
Multiple Options for Promotion
Implemented in 20 states
The state offers at least three pathways for promotion to fourth grade including achieving a predetermined level on the state reading assessment, passing an alternative assessment or retest, or successfully demonstrating sufficient 3rd grade reading skills through a portfolio of student work.
Good Cause Exemptions for Some Students
Implemented in 18 states
Most students with disabilities and English Language Learners should be able to read on grade-level if provided with effective instruction and specialized support. However, there should be good cause exemptions that recognize the special needs of some students with disabilities, English language learners and students who were previously retained.
Policy adoption
is the first step, but
is the first step, but
implementation
is key.
is key.
Use the dropdown to explore
how states have adopted and
implemented each of the 18 Early Literacy
Fundamental Principles.
how states have adopted and
implemented each of the 18 Early Literacy
Fundamental Principles.
i
Learn about the levels of principle implementation
Implementation Color Key
Full Implementation
Full
Partial Implementation
Partial
Future Implementation
Future
Principle Not Adopted
Not
Full Implementation
The fundamental principle is adopted in policy, and there is evidence of full implementation.
Above & Beyond Badge
This badge recognizes efforts that exceed full implementation.
Partial Implementation
The fundamental principle is adopted in policy, but there is limited evidence of implementation.
Future Implementation
The fundamental principle is adopted in policy with a future date for implementation.
Principle Not Adopted
The fundamental principle is not adopted in policy, does not meet minimum implementation requirements or is grant-based and not sustainable.
Full Implementation
Full
Partial Implementation
Partial
Future Implementation
Future
Principle Not Adopted
Not
Explore each state’s adoption and implementation
of the 18 Early Literacy Fundamental Principles.
of the 18 Early Literacy Fundamental Principles.
Science of Reading (SOR) Training
Literacy/Reading Coaches
Educator Preparation Program (EPP) Alignment
Educator Preparation Program (EPP) Assessment
Funding for Literacy Efforts
Universal Reading Screener
Screener for Characteristics of Dyslexia
Parental Notification
District Adoption of High-Quality Instructional Materials
Eliminating Three-Cueing Instructional Materials
Individual Reading Plans
Regularly Monitor Student Progress
Evidence-Based Interventions
Summer Reading Camps
Parent Read-At-Home Plan
Initial Determinant Retention at 3rd Grade Based on State Assessment
Multiple Options for Promotion
Good Cause Exemptions for Some Students
CO
Principle Adoption Implementation
Click state for details
i
Learn about the levels of principle implementation
Implementation Color Key
Full Implementation
Full
Partial Implementation
Partial
Future Implementation
Future
Principle Not Adopted
Not
Full Implementation
The fundamental principle is adopted in policy, and there is evidence of full implementation.
Above & Beyond Badge
This badge recognizes efforts that exceed full implementation.
Partial Implementation
The fundamental principle is adopted in policy, but there is limited evidence of implementation.
Future Implementation
The fundamental principle is adopted in policy with a future date for implementation.
Principle Not Adopted
The fundamental principle is not adopted in policy, does not meet minimum implementation requirements or is grant-based and not sustainable.
Adoption is the first step,
but implementation is key.
but implementation is key.
Use the dropdown to explore
how states have adopted and implemented
each of the 18 Early Literacy Fundamental
Principles.
how states have adopted and implemented
each of the 18 Early Literacy Fundamental
Principles.
Tap on your state to explore.
A–F
G–L
M
N–P
R–W
Filter the map by principle
Filter the states by principle
Supports For Teachers & Policy
Science of Reading (SOR) Training
Literacy/Reading Coaches
Educator Preparation Program (EPP) Alignment
Educator Preparation Program (EPP) Assessment
Funding for Literacy Efforts
Assessment & Parent Notification
Universal Reading Screener
Screener for Characteristics of Dyslexia
Parental Notification
Instruction & Intervention
District Adoption of High-Quality Instructional Materials
Eliminating Three-Cueing Instructional Materials
Individual Reading Plans
Regularly Monitor Student Progress
Evidence-Based Interventions
Summer Reading Camps
Parent Read-At-Home Plan
Retention & Intervention
Initial Determinant Retention at 3rd Grade Based on State Assessment
Multiple Options for Promotion
Good Cause Exemptions for Some Students
Supports For Teachers & Policy
Science of Reading (SOR) Training
Implemented in 44 states
States, schools and districts should establish the science of reading as the common language for literacy instruction and then provide training to teachers to build capacity to teach these foundational skills that all students need to become skilled readers.
ExcelinEd’s Science of Reading Professional Learning Rubric is designed to assist state educational agencies (SEAs) in their evaluation and selection of professional learning grounded in the science of reading. This rubric is intended for use by evaluators who have completed in-depth professional learning in the science of reading and have experience applying this knowledge in the classroom. As a result, SEAs can make an informed decision about the best professional learning provider for educators in their state.
ExcelinEd’s Science of Reading Professional Learning Rubric is designed to assist state educational agencies (SEAs) in their evaluation and selection of professional learning grounded in the science of reading. This rubric is intended for use by evaluators who have completed in-depth professional learning in the science of reading and have experience applying this knowledge in the classroom. As a result, SEAs can make an informed decision about the best professional learning provider for educators in their state.
Literacy/Reading Coaches
Implemented in 29 states
Literacy coaches are an important support mechanism for teachers in the classroom by working directly with teachers to improve classroom practice and, ultimately, student reading achievement school-wide.
Educator Preparation Program (EPP) Alignment
Implemented in 45 states
Aligning teacher preparation programs to the science of reading ensures that elementary school, early childhood and special education educators licensed in a state have been provided with a strong foundation in evidence-based literacy instruction.
Educator Preparation Program (EPP) Assessment
Implemented in 33 states
Aligning initial candidate licensure tests to the science of reading and evidence-based instructional practices are an efficient and comprehensive way for teachers to demonstrate they possess the knowledge and skills needed to teach students to read.
Funding for Literacy Efforts
Implemented in 45 states
The primary grades are the least expensive and most timely opportunity to ensure every student is a successful reader. States should look for ways to reprioritize existing local, state and federal fund to support reading instruction and intervention statewide.
Assessment & Parent Notification
Universal Reading Screener
Implemented in 43 states
An approved universal screener administered three times per year is a key step to identifying students at-risk for reading difficulties, including dyslexia.
Screener for Characteristics of Dyslexia
Implemented in 38 states
For early interventions to target areas of need, a student must be identified as at-risk for a reading difficulty, including students who may have characteristics consistent with dyslexia.
Parental Notification
Implemented in 42 states
Parents should be notified immediately if their child has been identified with a reading deficiency. As a trusted partner, parents need to be part of instructional decisions for their child and be provided with support on how to help their child with literacy at home.
Instruction & Intervention
District Adoption of High-Quality Instructional Materials
Implemented in 42 states
The materials that districts choose for reading instruction impact student learning and teacher practice. High-quality instructional materials aligned to the science of reading and the respective state standards give teachers access to quality content and assignments.
Eliminating Three-Cueing Instructional Materials
Implemented in 20 states
Three-cueing is a flawed literacy instructional practice that teaches students to read based on meaning, structure and syntax, and visual cues, which may also be known as “MSV." This instructional model should be eliminated from curricula because it encourages students to guess, not sound out, words they do not know based on pictures or what they think might make sense given the context of the sentence.
Individual Reading Plans
Implemented in 32 states
Students who have a reading deficiency should have an individual reading plan created. The plan should include intervention services the student will receive and strategies for parents to use at home with their child.
Regularly Monitor Student Progress
Implemented in 47 states
Progress monitoring helps teachers track a student's progress in reading and adjust instruction to meet the student's needs in a timely manner. Monitoring can take many forms and can be embedded in classroom instruction.
Evidence-Based Interventions
Implemented in 40 states
Interventions grounded in the science of reading should target students' individual needs beginning with the lowest deficit skill that has been identified by data.
Summer Reading Camps
Implemented in 20 states
Reading skills that are lost during the summer slows progress toward reading proficiency by the end of the third grade. Children in low-income families lose one to three months of reading skills each summer. Reading camps can both remediate learning loss and build skills at the same time.
Parent Read-At-Home Plan
Implemented in 35 states
Read-at-home plans help families support their child's literacy skills at home and are often included in an Individual Reading Plan (IRP). They should be provided to parents as soon as a student is identified with a reading deficiency or those students who may face retention in third grade.
Retention & Intervention
Initial Determinant Retention at 3rd Grade Based on State Assessment
Implemented in 18 states
A student who is unable to demonstrate sufficient reading skills on the state test-based options provided – and does not meet a good cause exemption – be retained.
Multiple Options for Promotion
Implemented in 20 states
The state offers at least three pathways for promotion to fourth grade including achieving a predetermined level on the state reading assessment, passing an alternative assessment or retest, or successfully demonstrating sufficient 3rd grade reading skills through a portfolio of student work.
Good Cause Exemptions for Some Students
Implemented in 18 states
Most students with disabilities and English Language Learners should be able to read on grade-level if provided with effective instruction and specialized support. However, there should be good cause exemptions that recognize the special needs of some students with disabilities, English language learners and students who were previously retained.
Reset Filter
Science of Reading (SOR) Training
Implemented in 44 states
States, schools and districts should establish the science of reading as the common language for literacy instruction and then provide training to teachers to build capacity to teach these foundational skills that all students need to become skilled readers.
ExcelinEd’s Science of Reading Professional Learning Rubric is designed to assist state educational agencies (SEAs) in their evaluation and selection of professional learning grounded in the science of reading. This rubric is intended for use by evaluators who have completed in-depth professional learning in the science of reading and have experience applying this knowledge in the classroom. As a result, SEAs can make an informed decision about the best professional learning provider for educators in their state.
ExcelinEd’s Science of Reading Professional Learning Rubric is designed to assist state educational agencies (SEAs) in their evaluation and selection of professional learning grounded in the science of reading. This rubric is intended for use by evaluators who have completed in-depth professional learning in the science of reading and have experience applying this knowledge in the classroom. As a result, SEAs can make an informed decision about the best professional learning provider for educators in their state.
Literacy/Reading Coaches
Implemented in 29 states
Literacy coaches are an important support mechanism for teachers in the classroom by working directly with teachers to improve classroom practice and, ultimately, student reading achievement school-wide.
Educator Preparation Program (EPP) Alignment
Implemented in 45 states
Aligning teacher preparation programs to the science of reading ensures that elementary school, early childhood and special education educators licensed in a state have been provided with a strong foundation in evidence-based literacy instruction.
Educator Preparation Program (EPP) Assessment
Implemented in 33 states
Aligning initial candidate licensure tests to the science of reading and evidence-based instructional practices are an efficient and comprehensive way for teachers to demonstrate they possess the knowledge and skills needed to teach students to read.
Funding for Literacy Efforts
Implemented in 45 states
The primary grades are the least expensive and most timely opportunity to ensure every student is a successful reader. States should look for ways to reprioritize existing local, state and federal fund to support reading instruction and intervention statewide.
Universal Reading Screener
Implemented in 43 states
An approved universal screener administered three times per year is a key step to identifying students at-risk for reading difficulties, including dyslexia.
Screener for Characteristics of Dyslexia
Implemented in 38 states
For early interventions to target areas of need, a student must be identified as at-risk for a reading difficulty, including students who may have characteristics consistent with dyslexia.
Parental Notification
Implemented in 42 states
Parents should be notified immediately if their child has been identified with a reading deficiency. As a trusted partner, parents need to be part of instructional decisions for their child and be provided with support on how to help their child with literacy at home.
District Adoption of High-Quality Instructional Materials
Implemented in 42 states
The materials that districts choose for reading instruction impact student learning and teacher practice. High-quality instructional materials aligned to the science of reading and the respective state standards give teachers access to quality content and assignments.
Eliminating Three-Cueing Instructional Materials
Implemented in 20 states
Three-cueing is a flawed literacy instructional practice that teaches students to read based on meaning, structure and syntax, and visual cues, which may also be known as “MSV." This instructional model should be eliminated from curricula because it encourages students to guess, not sound out, words they do not know based on pictures or what they think might make sense given the context of the sentence.
Individual Reading Plans
Implemented in 32 states
Students who have a reading deficiency should have an individual reading plan created. The plan should include intervention services the student will receive and strategies for parents to use at home with their child.
Regularly Monitor Student Progress
Implemented in 47 states
Progress monitoring helps teachers track a student's progress in reading and adjust instruction to meet the student's needs in a timely manner. Monitoring can take many forms and can be embedded in classroom instruction.
Evidence-Based Interventions
Implemented in 40 states
Interventions grounded in the science of reading should target students' individual needs beginning with the lowest deficit skill that has been identified by data.
Summer Reading Camps
Implemented in 20 states
Reading skills that are lost during the summer slows progress toward reading proficiency by the end of the third grade. Children in low-income families lose one to three months of reading skills each summer. Reading camps can both remediate learning loss and build skills at the same time.
Parent Read-At-Home Plan
Implemented in 35 states
Read-at-home plans help families support their child's literacy skills at home and are often included in an Individual Reading Plan (IRP). They should be provided to parents as soon as a student is identified with a reading deficiency or those students who may face retention in third grade.
Initial Determinant Retention at 3rd Grade Based on State Assessment
Implemented in 18 states
A student who is unable to demonstrate sufficient reading skills on the state test-based options provided – and does not meet a good cause exemption – be retained.
Multiple Options for Promotion
Implemented in 20 states
The state offers at least three pathways for promotion to fourth grade including achieving a predetermined level on the state reading assessment, passing an alternative assessment or retest, or successfully demonstrating sufficient 3rd grade reading skills through a portfolio of student work.
Good Cause Exemptions for Some Students
Implemented in 18 states
Most students with disabilities and English Language Learners should be able to read on grade-level if provided with effective instruction and specialized support. However, there should be good cause exemptions that recognize the special needs of some students with disabilities, English language learners and students who were previously retained.
See how the fundamental principles of early literacy are implemented nationwide.
Nearly all kids can become strong readers. In fact, research shows that most children — including those identified with learning differences — can be taught to read through evidence-based practices. The state approaches represented below are great examples of how to reach full implementation per principle.
Explore the subsets
Supports For Teachers & Policy
Assessment & Parent Notification
Instruction & Intervention
Retention & Intervention
North Carolina
Example of Best practice
The Tar Heel state passed the Excellent Public Schools Act of 2021 that focuses on educator professional development and teacher preparation programs. This legislation named Lexia (formerly Voyager Sopris) as the professional development provider of Language Essentials for Teachers of Reading and Spelling (LETRS). Cohorts will be trained over a two-year period to ensure that all Pre-K and K-5 elementary educators complete the appropriate LETRS professional development option.
Full implementation means...
State-adopted SOR training is required for all K–3 teachers and administrators, and an implementation plan for rollout is clearly communicated to all educators.
Alabama
Example of Best practice
Notably, 757 out of 762 schools in the Cotton State have agreed to hire local reading specialists (building literacy coaches) and are awarded $85,000 to support such efforts. The literacy specialists provide support relating to literacy instruction, including focusing on providing training to new teachers and/or K–3 teachers who have the most “at-risk” or “struggling” students. Regional Literacy Specialists are assigned to districts to support local reading specialists. These specialists are designated for each
elementary school with any combination of a kindergarten, first grade, second grade, or third grade including virtual and charter schools.
Full implementation means...
Literacy coaches are trained in the science of reading and are assigned to each elementary school to provide job-embedded professional development and coaching to K–3 teachers.
Indiana
Example of Best practice
Indiana requires teacher preparation programs to include content within the curriculum that is aligned to the science of reading for those candidates obtaining an elementary generalist license that is valid for teaching K–5, early childhood or special education. The Hoosier State also prohibits teacher preparation programs from using curriculum or content that is based on the three-cueing model.
The Department must conduct a review of accredited teacher preparation programs to
ensure alignment with the coursework science of reading requirements. If a program is
not aligned, the program may lose their right to use the word “accredited.”
Full implementation means...
EPP required coursework (elementary, early childhood and special education) is aligned to the science of reading and prohibits the use of course materials that include three-cueing. Coursework includes evidence-based literacy instruction, how to administer reading assessments and how to identify students with reading difficulties, such as dyslexia.
Arkansas
Example of Best practice
The Natural State adopted Act 416 of 2017 which requires all K–6 and special education teacher candidates to pass a stand-alone teaching reading assessment — the Foundations of Reading. The test is aligned to scientifically-based reading research and assesses candidates' proficiency in and depth of understanding of reading and writing development. The state education agency (SEA) provided strategic support to help educator preparation programs (EPPs) align with state requirements. The SEA deployed literacy specialists and staff from the Educator Effectiveness Unit to problem-solve with EPP leaders and LETRS training was made available to EPPs.
Full implementation means...
Elementary education candidates must pass a science of reading aligned assessment to obtain teacher licensure.
Kentucky
Example of Best practice
Kentucky directs funding specifically to support state and/or local implementation of early literacy fundamental principles such as reading diagnostic and intervention and
LETRS training. The Bluegrass State also provides sustainable funding through the Read to Succeed Fund for professional learning academies, instructional materials, assessment, and the literacy coaching program.
Full implementation means...
Adequate funding is dedicated to support the sustainability of the implementation of each of the fundamental principles of the early literacy policy.
Arizona
Example of Best practice
Through a request for information process, the Arizona Department of Education created an approved list of tools that met the legislative requirements for literacy and dyslexia screening. Schools may choose one of the approved tools for screening all K–3 students three times per year (fall, winter and spring). Each school shall use the diagnostic information to plan evidence-based, appropriate and effective instruction and intervention for all students.
Full implementation means...
A state-approved universal reading screener is administered to K–3 students three times per year to identify students at risk for reading failure.
New Hampshire
Example of Best practice
New Hampshire requires schools to utilize an evidence-based screener to screen all students, upon entry to school and no later than 60 days beyond that, in grades K–3 for dyslexia and related disorders. Additional screening during the current school year and then two times per year through 3rd grade for students who show characteristics of dyslexia is also required.
Full implementation means...
A state-approved screener for characteristics of dyslexia assesses the following skills as developmentally appropriate: phonological and phonemic awareness, sound-symbol recognition, alphabet knowledge, decoding, rapid naming, encoding, and oral reading fluency. The screener is, at minimum, administered to all students at the end of Kindergarten and the beginning of first and second grade.
Nebraska
Example of Best practice
In 2018, the Cornhusker State adopted the Nebraska Reading Improvement Act, which requires that parents or guardians of a student identified with a reading difficulty are notified, in writing or electronic form, of this identification within 15 days. Students who have been identified receive an individualized reading plan that includes evidence-based interventions and supports that will accelerate literacy development. The plan also includes benchmarks for growth, regular progress reports on the student and ideas for home support.
Full implementation means...
The state requires parental notification of students identified with reading difficulties within 30 days of each administration of the state-approved universal reading screener and/or dyslexia screener.
Colorado
Example of Best practice
The Centennial State passed the Literacy Curriculum Transparency Act in 2021 which requires districts to report their adopted HQIM to the state and post the information on the district’s website in an easily identifiable location. Materials are required to be evidence-based or scientifically based, be high-quality, meet state standards and demonstrate a full alignment to the science of reading. Colorado created the Literacy Transparency Dashboard to provide information on state, district, school and grade-level instructional materials. There is also an Advisory List of Instructional Programming which includes guidance on core, intervention and supplemental instructional materials.
Full implementation means...
The state requires school districts to adopt high-quality instructional materials aligned to the science of reading and state standards from a vetted and approved list. Districts must post their adopted materials on the district website.
Louisiana
Example of Best practice
In 2022, Louisiana enacted HB 865, eliminating the use of textbooks or instructional materials that employ the three-cueing systems model of teaching reading based on meaning, structure and syntax, and visual, which is also known as “MSV,” are used in reading instruction.
Full implementation means...
The state has adopted a policy to eliminate the use of all instructional materials that include the three-cueing systems model for teaching word reading with a clear timeline for the elimination of the use of these materials.
Michigan
Example of Best practice
Michigan’s Read by Grade Three law requires an Individual Reading Intervention Plan (IRIP) for all K–3 students who are behind in reading, prepared within 30 days after the identification of the reading deficiency. The IRIP is created in partnership with the student’s teacher, school principal, parent or legal guardian and other pertinent school personnel and describes the reading intervention services and supports that the student will receive to remedy the reading deficiency. Teachers may use the MiRead Tool, an online dashboard, to collect data and create and track IRIP information.
Full implementation means...
The state requires schools to develop and implement an individual reading plan for students who are identified as having a reading deficiency within 30 days of receiving screening results. There is an established process for monitoring the implementation of those plans and a timeline for notifying parents of the development of the plan.
Connecticut
Example of Best practice
In 2021, the Connecticut Department of Education shifted their progress monitoring to a Sensible Assessment approach, with the goal of making high-quality instruction accessible to all students and involving parents and guardians in all phases of student learning and engagement. The state offers guidance to a diverse set of educators on how to “assess” incoming students without necessarily having to “test” using formal assessments, while maximizing instructional time and accelerating student learning.
Full implementation means...
The state requires schools to regularly monitor and document students’ progress within a multi-tiered system of supports (MTSS) and utilize the data to inform instruction and interventions as needed and in a timely manner. Monitoring can take many forms (i.e., observations, screeners, assessments, and student work).
Alaska
Example of Best practice
The Alaska Reads Act, adopted in 2022, requires that students who are identified as having deficits in reading or scoring in the lowest level on the universal screener receive interventions grounded in the science of reading. The Last Frontier State has a vetted and approved list of intervention programs from which districts may choose. Each school district must offer intensive reading intervention services to students in grades K-3 who are identified as having reading deficits. Interventions may be provided during or after school. Progress is monitored through the MTSS process and shared with parents at least 10 times per year.
Full implementation means...
The state requires school districts to target students’ needs by adopting interventions grounded in the science of reading from a vetted and approved list. Interventions are provided before, during, or after school.
Alabama
Example of Best practice
The Yellowhammer State passed the Alabama Literacy Act in 2019 which established summer reading camps and the Alabama Summer Achievement Program (ASAP). All districts must offer summer reading camps, and staff must be trained in scientifically based reading instruction and intervention. Instruction must include at least 60 hours of direct, explicit and systematic reading intervention. ASAP is offered in the lowest five percent of elementary schools. Alabama is particularly noteworthy for their reporting requirements for summer camp.
Full implementation means...
The state requires districts to offer summer reading camps to rising first – fourth grade students at risk of reading failure to remediate learning loss and/or build reading skills. Staff are required to be trained in the science of reading.
Arizona
Example of Best practice
Arizona believes that families play a crucial role in helping support foundational early reading skills and have developed a family engagement center that can be utilized at home year-round. Here, families have access to free reading resources, can explore Arizona schools and receive updates about literacy across the states.
Full implementation means...
The state requires schools to provide read-at-home plans to parents as soon as a student is identified with a reading deficiency. Strategies shared with parents target students’ needs based on data and are aligned with the science of reading.
Florida
Example of Best practice
In Florida, no student may be assigned to a grade level based solely on age or other factors that constitute social promotion. If a student scores in the lowest performance level on the state assessment, the parent or guardian will be notified by the school that their child will not be promoted to grade 4 until they achieve the required reading level. Only a good cause exemption shall promote a student to grade 4. Retention is not a simple repeat of the third grade. Students receive intensive supports like 90 minutes of core reading instruction from a teacher trained in the science of reading, intensive interventions, progress monitoring and small group instruction.
Full implementation means...
The state requires that a student who is unable to demonstrate sufficient reading skills on the state test-based options provided – and does not meet a good cause exemption – be retained.
South Carolina
Example of Best practice
South Carolina offers at least three pathways for promotion to 4th grade, including demonstrating reading proficiency on the state 3rd grade summative reading assessment, successful completion of summer reading camp, demonstrating 3rd grade reading proficiency on a state board approved alternative assessment and demonstrating mastery of the state standards in reading through a reading portfolio. The Palmetto State requires a review of a student's reading portfolio and summer reading camp post-assessment results to determine eligibility for promotion to 4th grade. The final decision for promotion is determined by the district superintendent, with recommendations from the principal.
Full implementation means...
The state offers at least three pathways to promotion to fourth grade including achieving a predetermined level on the state reading assessment, passing an alternative assessment or retest, or successfully demonstrating sufficient 3rd grade reading skills through a portfolio of student work.
Mississippi
Example of Best practice
For Mississippi students who do not pass the assessment at or above the level for promotion, the school district can promote a student for meeting one of the following Good Cause Exemptions:
- Limited English Proficient student who has less than two (2) years of instruction in an English Language Learner program
- Student with a disability whose Individualized Education Program (IEP) indicates that participation in the statewide accountability assessment program is not appropriate, as authorized under state law
- Student with a disability who participate in the state annual accountability assessment and who has an IEP or Section 504 Plan that reflects that the individual student has received intensive remediation in reading for two (2) years but still demonstrates a deficiency or was previously retained in Kindergarten, 1st, 2nd, or 3rd grade
- Student who demonstrates an acceptable level of reading proficiency on an alternative standardized assessment approved by the State Board of Education
- Student who received intensive intervention in reading for two (2) or more years but still demonstrates a deficiency in reading and who was previously retained in Kindergarten, first, second or third grade for a total of two (2) years and has not met exceptional education criteria
Full implementation means...
The state allows specific good cause exemptions for promotion to fourth grade that recognize the special needs of some students with disabilities, English language learners, and students who were previously retained. Intensive interventions are required to continue in fourth grade for students promoted for good cause.
Helpful Resources
Our model policy is comprised of fundamental principles designed to support educators and students.
Student learning depends on teacher knowledge. Closing the teacher preparation gap can close the literacy gap.
Learn how your state can align an early literacy curriculum based on strategies focused on scientific research.
Learn how your state can identify students for risk factors of dyslexia using a valid and reliable dyslexia screener.